How misinformed, dumb and/or dishonest does someone have to be to read Lichtblau's article -- reporting that the court "found that Congress had acted within its authority in August 2007 when it passed a hotly debated law known as the Protect America Act" -- and conclude that this had anything to do with the "inherent constitutional authority" of the President to eavesdrop in violation of a Congressional statute?  And what kind of self-proclaimed legal expert would make giddy claims about "vindication" from a court decision without at least noting that he hadn't read the decision and making it clear that he had no idea whether this was true? 

A comprehensive look into the details surrounding the rumored "Vindication" from the Fisa court.  It's a long but good read, and the comments are coming in fast. Take the time to click through to read the whole story.

Today's FISA ruling: a case study in 8 years of lying and ignorance - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com